Around three million homes in the UK have broadband speeds of less than two megabits per second (2Mbps) according to research commissioned by the BBC.
The government has promised to provide all homes in the UK with speeds of at least 2Mbps by 2012.
The research revealed that so-called notspots are not limited to rural communities with many in suburban areas, and even streets in major towns.
There are some maps too, showing graphically where is hot and where is not. Let's pick one and zoom in to casa Linfoot.
There it is. A large blue blob squarely superimposed on my entire neighbourhood. Checking the legend and... Blue means slow, apparently - a notspot no less.
10Mbps not fast enough, then?
The problem seems to be that virtually every survey of broadband speed looks only at ADSL and a lot of people get broadband through other technologies, such as cable.
I don't think the situation is quite as dire as we are being led to believe.
Category: T'Internet
Technorati: Broadband notspot
(0)
We petition the Prime Minister to investigate the Phorm technology and if found to breach UK or European privacy laws then ban all ISP's from adopting it's use. Additionally the privacy laws should be reviewed to cover any future technologies such as Phorm
The UK's three largest ISP's, Virgin Media, BT and TalkTalk are all in talks with a view to introducing the Phorm technology. This would result in the browsing habits of the majority of the UK population being sold to a third party for advertising purposes. The opt out system for this technology is vague and unproven, even when opting out your every move on the Internet might be recorded. Surely this must be a breach of privacy laws, if not then the privacy laws need to be changed to cover such invasive technology.
Reasonably clear, I think.
Well, the government's response has just been published.
They not only pass the buck to the Information Commissioner's Office, they do so using an ICO document which is itself well over a year old - nearly as old as the petition itself.
How is this advancing the debate?
We are witnessing the birth of a new style of government - a combination of apathy, procrastination, abdication of responsibility, spin and impenetrable bureaucracy.
All we need now is a name for it...
Category: Phorm
Technorati: #fail Phorm e-Petition
(1)
Dear owner of chris-linfoot.net,
I noticeded [sic] that your domain "chris-linfoot.net" expires in a few weeks, which means that it is going to be publicly available soon. I'd like to buy this domain name before it expires.
I assume that you are not interested in keeping it for yourself.
I can buy this domain for $60 plus any renewal related expenses. What do you think?
Security Certificate expiration in Lotus Domino on May 18th 2009
This note contains links (URLs [1]) to technical support documents (technotes [1]) related to an issue affecting IBM Lotus Domino customers. You are receiving this notification because you are a customer who has called us for technical support in the past. If you do not wish to receive notifications like this one on other topics in the future, please reply to this email and change the Subject field to: unsubscribe <e-mail address>, e.g. unsubscribe user@company.domain. This is a special mailing separate from regular Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) mailings to urgently provide information about this expiration situation.
What is happening
The certificate for some Java applets in Lotus Domino 6.5.x, Domino 7.0.x, Domino 8.0.x, and Domino 8.5 have an expiration date of May 18, 2009 [2]. Starting May 19th, Web users will see a dialog with a message similar to one of the following when loading a Web page that contains a Java applet from the Domino server:
"The digital signature was generated with a trusted certificate but has expired or is not yet valid."
"The security certificate has expired or is not yet valid."
This issue can occur even if IBM is set up as a trusted publisher in the browser.
What does this mean
Please be assured that this message does not mean security has been compromised [3]. It simply reflects the expiration of the signature originally provided in the security certificate used with certain Domino applets. You can find an explanation in the following technote [4]:
Title: "Security certificate expiration messages generated from Domino applets (May 18, 2009)"
URL [5]: http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899&uid=swg21381298
Action needed to resolve
To resolve the situation, you have three options: (1) Instruct users to "Always Trust" content from IBM, (2) if using Domino 7.x, upgrade to Domino 7.0.4, or (3) download and apply fixes. IBM recommends that you replace the affected Jar files (option 3) as described in the following download document for any supported release of Domino:
Title: "Download re-signed Java applets for Lotus Domino (May 18, 2009)"
URL [5]: http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899&uid=swg24022981
Alternatively, an interim fix will be posted to Fix Central for the latest Modification and Fix Pack levels by May 8th. These include Domino 6.5.6 FP3, 7.0.3 FP1, 7.0.4, 8.0.2 FP1, and 8.5.0. If you're not running one of these releases, access the download document above, which provides fixes for all supported release levels.
(Thanks, Bart)
In those rare and all too brief lulls in the otherwise incessant media coverage of the inexplicable evaporation of global capital, at least one other story has actually had some press.
I refer, of course, to the British government plan to eavesdrop on all of our communication.
The Directive enforcing this new duty on ISPs to retain data about their customers' use of their services came into effect on 6 April.
Category: T'Internet
Technorati: communication interception
(1)