PermaLink SPF, DomainKeys are not anti-spam technologies
I've said it before but it evidently bears repeating. Technologies designed to eliminate spoofing and ensure that email that appears to be from example.com actually is from example.com (such as SPF and DomainKeys) are not in and of themselves anti-spam technologies.
  1. They may ultimately prevent the use by spammers of spoofed addresses in, for example, yahoo.com but they will not prevent the use by spammers of any domain which either has no published SPF/DomainKeys information or which actually belongs to the spammer.

  2. Also (and the reason for this rant), the presence of valid SPF during message delivery or of a valid DomainKeys signature in a delivered message are not in and of themselves indications that that same message is not itself spam.

Users have reported a brace of 419 spams from Yahoo! today. One, being from a yahoo.co.uk address bears no DomainKeys signature (they have evidently yet to implement DomainKeys for their .co.uk domain). The other from a yahoo.com address does have a DomainKeys signature. And as well as the header bearing the DomainKeys signature, it also helpfully offers this header directly above that DomainKeys header:

Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys

I hope the irony of this is not lost on the Yahoo! abuse team or on you, gentle reader.

Category: Fixing SMTP
Technorati:

Comments :

1. Eric Parsons23/02/2005 18:35:09
Homepage: http://www.startingblockcomputing.com


Those who don't know irony, also need to look up subtlety. DomainKeys are antispam, like drivers licenses are anti traffic accidents.




2. Nathan T. Freeman24/02/2005 08:00:11


And what processes *really* prevent traffic accidents?

Traffic lights
Adjustable insurance premiums
Anti-lock brakes & traction control
Traffic police monitoring & fines
Driving conventions and right-of-way rules

The observation of these things has nothing whatsoever to do with the possession of a driver's license. The license is a secondary layer that technically demonstrates that you understand the last item above, much like a professional certification. But you can understand and follow driving conventions without actually being licensed.




3. Jon Johnston28/02/2005 21:22:59
Homepage: http://bingo.cbsol.com


The biggest problem is that (at least at this point), more spamming organizations have signed up to use SPF than have real businesses. It's doubtful that SPF will have any significant impact on antispam.




4. Chris Linfoot28/02/2005 22:09:39


Quite so. And see this which I posted earlier today for another example of a missed SPF opportunity.

http://chris-linfoot.net/d6plinks/CWLT-6A2GBJ




Unable to post a comment? Please read this for a possible explanation...
Add Manual Trackback
Please enter the details of the trackback post. Your trackback will not appear on the site until it has been verified. This won't be immediate, as trackbacks are validated on a scheduled basis. Be patient.











Search
Popular Categories
Monthly Archive
Other stuff
ClustrMaps
Contact Me
Meta
Proudly powered by IBM Lotus Domino 8 Proudly powered by IBM Lotus Domino 8

Subscribe to articles Subscribe to articles feed

Subscribe to comments Subscribe to comments feed

ROR info ROR info


My Amazon wish list Wishlist


Wikio - Top Blogs - Technology
Like what I do?
Then please consider a donation to support the work of Research Autism.

Idea Jam
Planet Lotus
Dilbert