Could there be a legitimate reason why a remote host would use HELO my.fully.qualified.host.name when delivering email?
Well, we changed the Domino HELO rules to move messages to a quarantine database instead of rejecting at source as before. I needed to see some samples. Curiously, not a single message ended up in this quarantine database.
Next, checked the virus log. There they were! Asked Google about Netsky HELO. And right here we have an answer *.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I hereby modify my advice on the use of the HELO/EHLO phrase to reject email at source as follows:
The use of your own host names, IP addresses or Internet domains in the HELO/EHLO phrase during an inbound SMTP transaction is not a bulletproof spam indicator. It is a bulletproof spam or virus indicator.
So I commend the concept to you once again -- Really! No false positives!
Update 12 Jan 2005: * That link at unixwiz.net, a blog permalink, is now 404 - make that a tempalink. The gist of it was that many Netsky variants' SMTP engines do in fact say HELO/EHLO with the domain name of the victim.
Category: Domino: Administration
Technorati: Domino: Administration
1. Mark Dowling03/05/2006 16:29:27
Homepage: http://cork2toronto.blogspot.com
Chris
Wayback has a copy:
http://web.archive.org/web/20040402025609/http://www.unixwiz.net/blog/archives/001173.html
2. Dave05/07/2006 22:21:07
Help Please...
My Domino server is responding to a HELO command with the wrong IP address. I've looked everywhere and can't find where this is pulled from. Can you tell me where this IP is coming from?
Thanks
Dave
3. Chris Linfoot06/07/2006 08:27:57
Well behaved MTAs do not respond to HELO with an IP address at all. They respond with their fully qualified host name. On a Domino server, the server document field "Fully qualified Internet host name:" holds the FQHN and this is the value used in responding to HELO.
Unable to post a comment? Please read this for a possible explanation...